60 Points
800-1000 Words
Prompt: Engaging with at least two of the works we read in this unit, create an original argument about humankind’s relationship to the natural world.
Note: This should engage skills similar to those used in a synthesis essay. |
Details:
· For this essay, “engaging with” can mean directly responding to, quoting, or otherwise deliberately and obviously using the sources as part of your argument (you can agree, disagree, or whatever).
· Be sure to cite using the author’s name and the piece title in your lead up to any quotes; no need for page #’s since the text is just our own reading packet.
· This essay does not require a “multi-paragraph” essay structure where each paragraph functions as a parallel, equal contribution to the overall thesis.
· You may organize organically or creatively – different paragraphs will serve different functions.
· You do not need quoted evidence in each paragraph, nor do you even need to analyze the arguments the other authors make.
· Personal opinion, personal evidence, and the resultant personal pronouns are entirely acceptable; however, stronger essays will engage with the topic mostly on a broader level than your own limited vantage point.
Some questions to consider as you begin:
· Are humans still subject to the laws of nature or the natural world?
· Does it even matter if humans are connected to nature or our roots as pre-conscious “animals” when biology ruled us instead of society?
· Is the survival of humanity connected to the preservation of the natural world?
· Is the happiness of humanity connected to the preservation of the natural world?
· How much of human behavior can be attributed to “natural” causes?
Tips for approach:
· Find solitude. Go for a walk outside. As you walk, what do you experience? What’s your relationship to your surroundings? Write as soon as you get home.
· Establish an argument. Either this can be a philosophy that is inspired by or in direct response to your assigned readings.
Your essay will be graded holistically but you will receive subscores on the following criteria:
Goal | Needs Improvement | Fair | Very Good | Excellent |
Controvertible Stance (Thesis, argument present) | ||||
Engagement with Prompt | ||||
Argumentative Rigor (Reasoning) | ||||
Voice / Creativity | ||||
Functional Organization | ||||
Small Skills (conventions, etc.) |
Notes: